Appeals Court Overturns Vergara Lawsuit
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, April 14, 2016
More on the Vergara lawsuit
Educators Applaud Appellate Ruling in Meritless Vergara Lawsuit
LOS ANGELES —In a sweeping victory for students and educators,
the California Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court
decision in the deeply flawed Vergara v. California lawsuit. The
unanimous appellate opinion is a stinging rebuke to Judge Rolf M.
Treu’s poorly-reasoned ruling, and to the allegations made and
millions of dollars spent by wealthy anti-union ducation
reformers” to bypass voters, parents, and the legislature with
harmful education policy changes. The reversal affirms the
arguments of educators, civil rights groups, legals cholars and
education policy experts that the state statutes affirming
educator rights do not harm students.
“This is a great day for educators, and, more importantly, for
students,” said California Teachers Association President Eric C.
Heins. “Today’s ruling reversing Treu’s decision overwhelmingly
underscores that the laws under attack have been good for public
education and good for kids and that the plaintiffs failed to
establish any violation of a student’s constitutional rights.
Stripping teachers of their ability to stand up for their
students and robbing school districts of the tools they need to
make sound employment decisions was a wrong-headed scheme
developed by people with no education expertise and the appellate
court justices saw that.”
In their 36-page decision, Justices Boren, Ashmann-Gerst and Hoffstadt outline the numerous ways in which plaintiff’s arguments were wrong and Judge Treu’s decision declaring the statutes unconstitutional could not be affirmed. “We reverse the trial court’s decision. Plaintiffs failed to establish that the challenged statutes violate equal protection, primarily because they did not show that the statutes inevitably cause a certain group of students to receive an education inferior to the education received by other students. … the statutes do not address the assignment of teachers; instead, administrators—not the statutes—ultimately determine where teachers within a district are assigned to teach. Critically, plaintiffs failed to show that the statutes themselves make any certain group of students more likely to be taught by ineffective teachers than any other group of students. With no proper showing of a constitutional violation, the court is without power to strike down the challenged statutes. The court’s job is merely to determine whether the statutes are constitutional, not if they are “a good idea.”…The judgment is reversed. The matter is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter judgment in favor of defendants on all causes of action.”
“Today’s decision vindicates decades of experience that show many local districts across the state are working collaboratively with teachers to help public education thrive. We need to take those best practices and expand them, not wipe out education codes that protect students and teachers,” said Joshua Pechthalt, president of the California Federation of Teachers. “We have a looming teacher shortage that is made worse by lawsuits like this one and the constant attacks on teachers and public education. We need to work together to raise up teacher performance and create a climate that keeps veteran teachers in the classroom and attracts young people to the profession.”
Vergara was the brainchild of Silicon Valley multi-millionaire David Welch and a group of corporate attorneys and public relations experts who founded the organization Students Matter to back the suit and to recruit the nine student plaintiffs used to front their failed attempt. At issue in the case were five California statutes covering due process rights for teachers, probationary periods, and the value of educator experience when school districts are forced to lay off personnel due to cuts.
Over the course of a nearly two-month trial, award-winning teachers, superintendents, principals, school board members, education researchers, and policy experts testified to the benefit of these laws and how they work quite well to ensure quality instructors in well-run school districts. Plaintiff attorneys put on witnesses from often dysfunctional districts where administrators attempted to blame the laws instead of their own failures to fulfill basic responsibilities such as spending time in classrooms observing teachers or providing assistance to struggling educators. No connection was ever made between the challenged laws and any student being harmed or any teacher who should not be in a classroom remaining there. The Court of Appeal decision repeatedly affirmed that the current laws do not prevent districts from making personnel decisions.
Pechthalt and Heins say now we can continue to focus on the work are entrusted to do and that is to educate our students.
More information on the case as well as background can be found here and here.
The 325,000-member CTA is affiliated with the 3.2 million-member National Education Association. The California Federation of Teachers is the statewide affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, and represents more than 100,000 faculty and school employees in public and private schools and colleges, from early childhood through higher education.