Part-time Faculty Committee Minutes Print E-mail

October 13, 2007

Manhattan Beach Marriott

The meeting was called to order at 10:10AM

Members Present: Sandra Baringer, Beverly Cope, Phyllis Eckler, John Govsky, Mehri

Hagar, Kathy Holland, Julie Ivey, Deborah Kaye, Neal Kelsey, Sam Russo (Chair),

Mindy Tenen

Also Present: Pat Lerman (CFT Staff), Mary Millet (CFT Staff), Mona Field (CCC

Liaison)

Members Absent: Mark Anderson, Mike Dixon, Kimberly Keenan, Dan Salamone, Mary

Van Ginkle

Approval of Agenda:

Moved by Phyllis, seconded by John to approve the Agenda with Additional

Items: Part-Time salary aligned with full-time salary schedule and COCAL. Approved

unanimously. It was also MSC to add Campus Equity Week, Pick-a-Prof website,

CPFA, and Report from AFT to New Business.

Approval of Minutes:

It was MSC to approve the Minutes of the May 19, 2007 meeting with

corrections (Part-Time Committee rather than Part-Timer Committee, and Carl rather

than Car Friedlander). It was also MSC that Mona shall henceforth take minutes, from

now on with computer.

Business/Discussion:

There was a discussion centered on the revival of the Part-Time Task Force within

the System Office. The Committee supports the revival of the this Task Force so that

Part-Time faculty have a voice and some connection to the State Chancellor’s Office. It

was MSC that Sam ask Carl Friedlander to write a letter on behalf of the CCC urging the

reconvening of the Task Force, and that other members contact our fraternal organizations

to ask them to also write letters asking for reconvening of the Task Force [i.e., FACCC

(Kathy), CCA, CPFA, CCI (Phyllis)]. It was also decided that we should check with

David Milroy about progress on this issue.

We then had a lengthy discussion on the construction of the Part-Time Committee. After

a presentation of some background information and a discussion, the Committee agreed to

be open to non-faculty members being appointed to the Committee by the CFT

President. It was decided that Sam will convey the Committee’s attitude to Marty for his

future recruitment activities. A question was asked as to whether there are part-timers in

ECE/K-12 and Classified. The answer is “yes”, but that these folks get equal pay for

equal work. It was also decided that if new members are appointed, the Committee

budget might need to be increased. It was MSC that the Part-Time Committee is open to

other part-time/contingent workers who belong to CFT being on the Committee. It was

also noted that the Committee’s mission statement is online: “The purpose and goal of

the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee is to advance, through political action and

collective bargaining, the interests of contingent faculty in both public and private higher

education.” This mission statement will need to be changed to reflect the new

constitution of the Committee.

There followed a lengthy discussion concerning the proposed change from the 60% Law

to the 67% Law. We discussed how to proceed at this time while waiting for an author

(legislator) and a bill number. As an action item, it was decided that all of us should talk

with our respective legislators about 67% in order to prepare them for the bill. It was

also pointed out that we should make certain that our Local leaders are informed, that we

should contact our fraternal organizations (FACCC, CPFA, CCA, CCI) to gain their

official endorsements. Also, CFT, through Deborah, will publish an Issues Paper. A

discussion also ensued concerning other potential organizations to approach about

supporting 67%. After lunch, and with input from Carl Friedlander, it was agreed to not

seek any other involvement beyond the organizations mentioned above. It was also

decided that we should begin working on this bill even before it has a bill number. Mona

asked whether the Committee would like her to see whether the Los Angeles Community

College District would support 67%; getting management support will help with passage

of the bill. Marty stated that management will support anything that doesn’t give tenure

to faculty. John suggested that perhaps we should focus on Academic Senates. Marty

said that the Academic Senate will take a position, but it is very closely divided. The

issue could be placed on the State Senate agenda as an emergency item. We also discussed

which of our members would go to other organizations to ask for support. It was decided

that Kathy and Phyllis would contact FACCC, CPFA, CCA, and CCI.

A discussion followed about the Community College Initiative (now Prop 92). Phyllis

pointed out that K-12 is shrinking, and Prop 98 funding is based on growth in K-12. At

the same time that K-12 is shrinking, the community colleges are growing. Community

colleges will not be harmed by K-12 shrinking if Prop 92 passes. Marty stated that CTA

has decided to oppose Prop 92 because there is no accountability in terms of the money

being spent in the classroom.

We then discussed FACE legislation, and part-timers’ role in advancing FACE legislation.

Deborah said that FACE now has a blog and anyone can contribute. Sam stated that

other states in addition to California have introduced FACE legislation and that he would

have a complete list of those states for our next meeting (actually, I’ll get the list and email

it to the Committee).Deborah said that there is nothing hew to report at this time,

but encouraged everyone to visit the AFT FACE website/blog so they can claim many

hits.

It was pointed out that the one-time augmentation of $4 million was vetoed by the

governor. Even though it is moot now that it has already been vetoed, we should continue

to fight to make certain that Health Care remains a line item in the state budget.

A lengthy discussion followed concerning unemployment issues for Part-Time faculty

who also sub in K-12. There have been reports, via FACCC, that some Part-Time

faculty are losing their appeals because of K-12 sub status. Kathy asked whether the

Cervisi decision can be expanded to include community college instructors who also sub

in K-12. Pat, who is a lawyer, will research the issue, perhaps consult with Robert

Bezemek, and report back. Options for action may include a test case or further

legislation to clarify the Cervisi court ruling about unemployment for adjuncts.

Phyllis brought up the issue of Part-Time/full-time salary equity issues. Phyllis has a

complex idea for helping part-timers by placing them on full-time salary schedules.

Phyllis will send the article she wrote and her spreadsheets to everyone for their local use.

Phyllis also pointed out that adjuncts who grade papers, for instance, are not paid

equitably when compared to full-timers. This would help bring adjuncts to pro-rata. She

also suggested that we ask for more money every year; that is, more columns and steps

for both full-time and part-time. This must be done on the local level. Phyllis suggested

that more money should go to those who teach 12 to 15 credit load since they do grade

papers, while 18 hour credit load folks do not have to do grading of papers. In this way,

everyone will get some salary increase, but there should be another pot of money to help

equalize pay.

COCAL will be held in San Diego, August 8 – 10, 2008. We need to gather sponsors for

the event. John will attend as the Part-Time Committee rep. Also planning to attend are

Sandra, Julie, Mark, and Mindy. Sam said that the money is in our budget to send

members to COCAL. Mary stated that AFT has already contributed. Julie asked about

the topics at COCAL. Sandra suggested that we get someone to speak on bargaining.

Under Old Business, Deborah pointed out that the CFT Part-Timer will be published

only 2 times per year.

John noted that during Campus Equity Week, the Cabrillo district is holding an event to

honor Part-Time faculty who teach in the district.

John led a discussion of the Pick-a-Prof website. This website makes public the exact

grades given by each teacher in each course. Students can read these ratings and then

decide which classes to take. Administrators can also read these ratings and use them for

re-hire purposes. Currently, anyone has free access to this website, including students

who are shopping for “easy graders”. This website also raises the issues of grade

inflation and adjunct insecurity. In other words, will adjuncts give many A’s in order to

be re-hired? The website also places pressure on adjuncts to get good ratings. This is a

very serious issue. Mehri said that she understood that there is a lawsuit against Pick-a-

Prof. John recommends taking the data to your college’s Academic Senate to remind them

of the danger to academic integrity and quality of teaching when adjuncts feel that they

must give A’s in order to have enrollment and to retain their jobs. It was also pointed out

that many districts have evaluation forms for adjuncts that are identical to those used to

evaluate full-time faculty. Part-Time leaders should work with their local to ensure that

adjunct evaluation forms be appropriately worded to reflect the works that adjuncts are

paid to do.

Sandra asked for articles for the CPFA News. It was discussed as to whether the

Committee should place one or two ads, and whether we should include a list of all CFT

locals. Also, do we want to pay for a quarter-page ad to advocate for the change to 67%?

It was MSC to authorize $575 for a quarter-page ad with contents to include a push for

67% legislation and other pertinent CFT Part-Time Committee information. Deborah will

draft the ad and get input from the subcommittee (Phyllis, Julie, and Mehri).

Deborah reported that she attended the AFT National Higher Ed Conference, and the

networking that took place. The next Higher Ed Conference is scheduled for March 27 –

30 in Washington, DC.

It was announced that the 2008 CFT Convention will be held April 11 – 13 in Oakland.

A brainstorming session followed concerning part-time workshop topics for the

Convention. Some of the topics proposed were Unemployment Insurance, Negotiating

separate evaluation forms for adjuncts, Pick-a-Prof website, Academic Freedom for Part-

Time faculty, Book Order options for Part-Time faculty, and Parity. It is understood that

we may not get three timeslots. Deborah will work with Julie and Mehri to create three

coherent workshop proposals. The Committee will try to meet at some time early during

the Convention. There will also be the usual Part-Time breakfast on Sunday morning.

The meeting adjourned at 3:05PM

The next scheduled meeting is Saturday, February 23, 2008 at the Oakland Airport

Hilton, from 10:00AM to 4:00PM

return to Part-time Faculty Committee page