 |
UC - AFT NEWS
|
|
On December 9, 2004, UC-AFT President Kevin Roddy and UC Berkeley
Local 1474 President Kathryn Klar met with new UC President Robert
Dynes. Here are brief reports from each with their impressions of
the new UC President.
Kathryn Klar's impressions
Dear Berkeley Non-Senate faculty colleagues,
On Tuesday evening, Dec. 9, UC-AFT systemwide President Kevin Roddy
and I had the opportunity to meet and converse briefly with UC's
new President, Robert Dynes, at a reception at the home of California
State Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi. Since taking up his
new position in October, President Dynes has said publicly on several
occasions that the number one priority for maintaining UC's educational
quality is undergraduate instruction. Tuesday evening I reminded
him of this, and made a point of stressing to him that non-Senate
faculty members are responsible for a significant portion of that
instruction, a statement with which he agreed. I told him that we
are a highly skilled and dedicated group of educational professionals
who deliver a quality product; and I further expressed the opinion
that it was insulting for the administration to continue to treat
us as expendable, temporary employees. I felt that he listened carefully
and respectfully, and he said to me that he understood and had taken
note of what I was saying.
I plan to continue to work for the professional recognition that
non-Senate faculty members deserve, and for the tangible markers
of that recognition. The administration can never again say that
they don't understand our situation or haven't heard our request
for fair and equitable treatment. On Tuesday, on behalf of each
of you, I told President Dynes himself.
As always, I look forward to meeting and talking with as many of
you as possible. Please feel free to drop
me an e-mail note.
In solidarity, Kathryn A. Klar
Lecturer in Celtic Studies
President, UC-AFT Local 1474
Kevin Roddy's impressions
My report, sadly, cannot be so optimistic. I asked President Dynes
about the Governor's plan to abolish the Institute of Labor and
Employment at Berkeley. He said that various "chancellors and provosts"
had reported that the Institute had become an "advocacy" organization
for labor, and that this deviated from the original purpose of the
Institute. Later on, Peter Olney told me that neither chancellor
at Berkeley or Los Angeles had expressed any dissatisfaction with
the Institute, so it may be more a matter of placating the Governor's
office than acceding to the desires of unnamed various "chancellors
and provosts." But I replied that Davis' School of Public Policy,
an excellent concept with Sacramento so close at hand, had been
morphed into a Graduate School of Management. He agreed.
The other issue that I raised was the cutback in UC Outreach, which
he felt was wrong; but when I asked if he would be testifying at
the Senate Hearing on those proposed cutbacks, he said he would
be busy interviewing an administrator. I said that the Union would
be there, and indeed it was; but, though it's difficult to imagine
to what purpose since the meeting was merely "informational," I
think that it would have been the right place for the new President
to be.
Nonetheless, I did mention, as Kathryn had, that we would like
our relationship to be cooperative, not combative; he seems to have
been fully prepared for the latter, so perhaps we did make a good
impression--and, more importantly, some progress--after all.
Cheers,
Kevin
|
 |